Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 05:02

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Michael Cole Reveals Which Match Will Main Event WWE Money In The Bank On Pre-Show - Wrestling Inc.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Megyn Kelly: Meghan Markle's Pregnancy Post Disrespects Childbirth - TheWrap
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Pokemon Scarlet And Violet's Free Switch 2 Update Is Now Live - GameSpot
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What are some current examples of injustice?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
The Full ‘Squid Game’ Season 3 Trailer Teases a Wild and Violent End - Gizmodo
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Marchand nets 2OT winner as Florida evens Finals - ESPN
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?